End
of Course Reflection
Winfred
K. Ridley
Walden
University
Dr. Anthony R. Artino, Jr., Ph.D.
EDUC-6115 Learning Theories & Instruction
10/27/2013
As
I reflect on completing Learning Theories & Instruction (EDUC-6115), it
comes to mind that, although I already knew the brain is a complex organ, I am
both surprised and struck by the intricate nature of how the brain functions,
and I have a deeper understanding of the brain’s physical characteristics and
connections (Ormrod, Schunk, & Gredler, 2009, p.p. 28-29 & 32-33). My
understanding also extends to the “differences between learning styles,
learning strategies, and learning theories” (Artino, 2013), and the “fast-paced
research and technologies are that are producing exciting platforms for
learning” (EDUC-6115 course introduction, 2013, Week 1).
Instructional
designers, as major contributors witnessing dynamic changes in learning, must
be prepared to meet their audiences with an appreciation for how the
physiological process of learning works (Ormrod, Schunk, & Gredler, 2009,
p. 28). That is, that the brain receives external stimuli from the learner’s
environment, carries it via receptor cells to the learner’s central nervous,
which then sends it back with instructions on how countless parts of the body
should respond (Ormrod, Schunk, & Gredler, 2009, p. 30). Although none of
these approaches is perfect, various methods in brain research, including
anima,l postmortem, brain injury, electrical recording, and neuroimaging
studies have given investigators remarkable insight into brain development from
infancy to adulthood (Ormrod, Schunk, & Gredler, 2009, p.p. 31-32).
Reflecting
on my personal learning process, midway through this course, I concluded that I
learned best cognitively. This theory has permitted me to ponder, analyze,
reflect and revise my thinking on several positions (Ertmer & Newby, 1993).
My learning foundation from primary school-social learning theory occurred here
(Kim, 2001), through college was based in behaviorism stimulus-response (Ertmer
& Newby, 1993), and my learning style and teaching theory stayed grounded
here. I have since gone through several learning processes, including the
constructivist theory of learning (Ebert, 2009), and I will say that now, I am
a strong supporter of the connectivist learning theory (Seimens, 2009). In my
situation, this includes behaviorism-my mandatory online training utilizes this
theory; cognitive theory-this domain is used in my building classroom and my
Walden classroom; constructivist theory-my professional development strategy
includes this theory; social constructivist theory-used in my role as a cluster
leader, connectivism-technology is in play here; and adult learning, which
again includes Walden as I am a self-motivated online learner (Conlan,
Grabowski & Smith, 2003).
Learning
theories evolve (Kerr, 2007) and the cognitive theory of learning, which
stresses the acquisition, conceptualization, and higher-ordered thinking of
knowledge (Ertmer & Newby, 1993, p. 58), is meaningfully encouraged in my
school system. The implementation of technology, the training that is aligned
with it, and the delivery of instruction are all geared toward increased cognitive
thinking. For example, we no longer assess students through tests (except for
semester courses) at midterm. Instead, we support portfolio assignments, which
often are digital, so that students can demonstrate learning by using quotes,
impressions, visualizations and other bodies of work produced during the
semester and at midterm. End of year exam assessments are optional, allowing
for the same style of higher-ordered thinking. These policies are aligned with
Virginia Beach City Public Schools’ (VBCPS) Strategic Plan for Student Success,
known as Compass to 2015; That is “Recognizing that the long range goal of the
VBCPS is the successful preparation and graduation of every student, the near
term goal is that by 2015, 95 percent or more of VBCPS students will graduate
having mastered the skills that they need to succeed as 21st century learners,
workers and citizens. (VBCPS, 2008).
The
ARCS motivational process is based on “four dimensions of motivation”;
“attention (A), relevance (R), confidence (C), and satisfaction (S) ( Keller,
1999).” Virginia Beach City Public Schools is a region, if not a state leader
in the area of technology implementation. Our facts about technology state: All
Virginia Beach schools have an overall student to computer ratio of about 2:1.
This is a combination of desktop and laptop computers. All schools have at
least one Computer Resource Specialist (CRS) -an expert in the integration of
technology into instruction. This combination of technology and well-trained
staff helps the division prepare students for the 21st century; all 11 high
schools, 11 middle schools, and the Advanced Technology Center have distance
learning labs; online courses are available during the school year and summer
school and interactive whiteboards are in all classrooms” (VBCPS, 2013). Many of these technological tools are
available to me now. As I continue my progression in Walden’s Master’s in Instructional
Design and Technology program, and evolve and mature as an instructional
designer, many of these systems will further become a part of my instructional
design practice.
References
Artino, A. (2013,
September 4). Re: A note of clarification... [Online forum comment] Retrieved
from Walden Blackboard website
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_3467633_1%26url%3D
Conlan, J., Grabowski,
S., & Smith, K. (2003). Adult learning. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging
perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved 10/2/2013, from
http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Adult_Learning [Web Article]
Ebert, A. (2009)
Theories of educational technology. Behaviorism vs. constructivism in the
technological secondary classroom. Boise State University. Retrieved from
https://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/edtechtheories/
Ertmer, P. A., &
Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing
critical features from an instructional design perspective.
Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4),50-71.
Kim, B. (2001). Social
constructivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching,
and technology. Retrieved from
http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Social_Constructivism [Web
Article].
Ormrod, J., Schunk, D.,
& Gredler, M. (2009). Learning theories and instruction (Laureate custom edition).
New York: Pearson.
Siemens, G. (2009). Connectivism. Laureate Education Inc. [Transcript].
VBCPS School Board
(2013). Retrieved from http://www.vbschools.com/compass/
VBCPS (2013). About Us.
Retrieved from http://www.vbschools.com/root/aboutUs.asp
Walden University.
Introduction to EDUC-6115 Week 1: Introduction and Historical Perspectives
(2013). Retrieved from
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_3467633_1%26url%3D